One control plane · isolation you can prove
Run multiple businesses with one AI workforce
If you own three businesses, you don't want three AI tools, three logins, and three places for data to leak. You want one workforce — and proof that each company stays sealed off from the others. PAI gives you a single phone over your whole portfolio, with isolation enforced by the database, not by a promise.
The owner with three businesses
This is our core customer: the owner who runs more than one company — a trading firm and a logistics outfit and a side venture, or an agency with a dozen clients who each need their own walled garden. Generic AI assistants force a choice: one shared brain that mixes everyone's data, or a separate subscription per business that you have to juggle by hand. Multi-company AI means neither — one workforce, many companies, zero bleed.
One phone, one control plane
Everything runs from a single stack you control and a single chat thread you already live in. You steer a different business by typing /company — and from then on, that conversation is pinned to the right company until you switch again. Briefings stack in order of what needs you most. Approvals queue in one place, filtered per company. Dozens of businesses, one phone.
Isolation enforced by the database (RLS)
This is the part that matters, and it's where PAI is genuinely strong. Per-company memory lives in Postgres with row-level security (RLS): company A's rows are physically invisible to company B's Pies. It is not a filter the application remembers to apply — it is the database refusing to return the rows at all. A Pie working your logistics business cannot see your trading customers, your agency client's secrets, or your family's data. And we don't ask you to take that on faith: cross-company isolation is proven by end-to-end tests in our stack. Isolation you can prove, not just believe.
The single-point-of-contact router
One phone over many businesses only works if messages land in the right place. The router is the traffic controller: it resolves every inbound message or task to a company — by channel, by sender, by your explicit /company switch — and pins the session there deterministically. When it genuinely can't tell which business something belongs to, it asks rather than guessing. The result is no context bleed: the right Pie, in the right company, every time.
Per-company memory, budgets, and audit
Each company is a complete, isolated world. Its Pies remember its customers and their preferences at reply time. Its budgets are its own, with a single rollup for you. Its audit trail is its own signed chain. You can restructure one business with a single change without touching the others. The “family” company is just another company — usually the one with the strictest settings of all.
Portfolio control, with the same leash on each
Scaling from one company to a portfolio doesn't loosen the grip. Every company carries the full Governance Plane: default-deny approvals, autonomy floors, hard-stop budgets, the signed audit chain, and a kill switch you can pull per-company or across the whole fleet. An AI CEO can run each business to its own goal, reporting to a board of one — you — while the memory, the money, and the record stay sealed off business by business. One control plane for your portfolio, with isolation the database guarantees and a record you can verify offline. That is the difference between running many businesses on AI and running them on an accountable AI.
Keep reading
The pieces that make one workforce safe across many businesses.
AI CEO Autopilot
A CEO Pie per company, each running to its own goal and reporting only to you.
Hard-stop AI agent budgets
Per-company caps with a single rollup — one business's spend never bleeds into another.
Managed AI agents that don't get stuck
Supervision and run contracts that keep every company's workforce moving.
Multi-company AI — FAQ
Yes — that's exactly who PAI is built for. You run every business from one stack and one phone. Each company gets its own isolated Pies, memory, budgets, and audit trail. You switch which one you're steering by typing /company in the same chat thread, and a router keeps each conversation pinned to the right business.
Isolation is enforced by the database itself, not by convention. Per-company memory uses row-level security (RLS) in Postgres, so company A's rows are physically invisible to company B's Pies — and we prove it with end-to-end tests, not just promises. A Pie working on one business cannot read another's customers, secrets, or context.
It's the part that makes one phone manageable. When a message or task comes in, the router decides which company it belongs to and pins the session there — and when it's unsure, it asks rather than guessing. That means VIP threads, per-company numbers, and your /company switches all resolve deterministically, with no context bleed between businesses.
Yes, and it's a popular pattern. Your household runs as its own company — often with the strictest settings of all: tightest budget, lowest autonomy, most aggressive privacy routing. The kids' homework Pie has pocket money and can't spend; the work Pies live in entirely separate companies. One control plane, very different leashes.
Yes. Per-company memory isolation via RLS, per-instance isolation, and /company routing from chat are all live and end-to-end tested in our stack. The full company-workspace UI (members, invites, an in-app switcher) rides the workforce layer and is enableable — switched on as it lands. The isolation guarantee underneath it is shipped.
One workforce for your whole portfolio
See multi-company control alongside every other capability — and the honest status of each — then choose your plan.